Recently I gave a presentation on Web 2.0 tools to a few teachers as a part of a technology sampler class I led. I’ve embedded the Prezi presentation below.
What interested me about this presentation wasn’t necessarily the content, though. It was what I did with that content after I created it, namely this:

I gave it a Creative Commons license of Attribution Only. For a number of months now I’ve been talking about how to respect the ownership rights of content creators when I chat with teachers and students, but I haven’t taken the step to license my own work. The act of licensing was an interesting process for me – I had to think about
- where I got the content that made up the presentation,
- the method I chose to deliver that content,
- the amount of time I invested to create the work, and
- how I wanted others to use what I created.
In this case I made a quick decision to license right after I finished the presentation, but after some reflection on each of the points above, I decided to remove it and release it from any license at all. The people I learned from were all over the web, and the information I was presenting wasn’t unique or (that) uniquely displayed. For all intents and purposes, my presentation is public domain, and I’m okay with that. In fact, I like that designation for this work. I simply aggregated something that lots of people were talking about anyway and delivered it in a way that fit my specific purposes. If someone wishes to remix that content and present it again, I’m happy to have obliged.
So, what’s the possible implication for kids? If I were in the classroom again, I think that for each project my students created, I would ask them to license it in some way, explaining their reasoning using the same or a similar process I went through myself. If an individual’s personal process was different than mine, I don’t think I’d mind – so long as she outlined it for me so I could see that she was thinking.
Kudos again to Creative Commons for giving us control over our own creative work. I’m happy to spread the good news and participate.
Update:
Recently, Kevin Gamble contacted me to correct a few things about my thinking above. I thought that the least I could ask of Creative commons was the attribution-only license, and that the closest I could get to public domain was Prezi’s own “Allow for reuse” setting. Via a conversation on Twitter and Buzz, however, I got to expand my understanding of Creative Commons by one more important license: CC0, a license that allows you to freely release your work entirely of its copyright.
So, voila:

Thanks, again, Kevin!
Oh, and here’s the presentation. Feel free to remix.