In my next few posts, I’ll be reflecting on a conference I attended in San Diego this week. I was fortunate to spend two days with the National Association of District Supervisors of Foreign Language (NADSFL) and then an additional day at the American Council of the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) conference. Each day held its own unique experience (and, therefore, necessitates its own post). If I can get around to it, I’ll detail my personal next steps in a final post sometime this week or next.
Day 1:
Wow. What a day. There are so many coordinators and supervisors here from across the nation, each sharing experiences and strategies for success. It has been a true privilege to participate in these discussions. They have expanded my lens quite a bit.
Some general themes that stuck out to me during the conversations I had:
- Assessment: Assessment should be performance-based and rest on a foundation of formative evaluations from teachers, peers, self, and the general public. I especially liked how Lynn Fulton Archer (@dlfulton) put it, “We are no longer the sole provider of content, so we can’t be the sole evaluator of that content.” I think tech can naturally step in to broaden the audience of a student’s work. It puts a student closer to the experience of “natural” acquisition of language because the impetus to learn comes from all directions, not just from the teacher.
- Buy-in: Buy-in is a key factor in curricular success. Both teachers and students should feel that their voices are heard and weighty in the selection, development, and delivery of curriculum.
- Funding: Funding is an issue across the country, but there are bright spots in the form of FLAP and other federal grants. There are also entire states who have begun a process of doing more with less, like Utah, but it requires a commitment to languages from the highest levels of government.
- Modeling: We must participate, as supervisors, professional development leaders, and teachers, in the very tasks we are asking of our students. Are we using 21st century tools and approaches in our own learning? Are using the concepts of formative assessments, including performance assessments, to evaluate our own progress as professionals? Are we asking ourselves to be self-directed, efficacious learners as we attempt to lead students down that road?
These are some provocative questions, ones that I’ll be pondering the next few days (years?). Again, it’s been a privilege to listen to some very experienced supervisors share their common struggles and victories.
Above all, the biggest theme of the day was how to support the work of great teachers, who are daily in the trenches laboring to encourage kids to value and develop the skills necessary to succeed in our increasingly global economy. I’m excited to get back among them.


