Reflecting on NADSFL, Day 1


In my next few posts, I’ll be reflecting on a conference I attended in San Diego this week.  I was fortunate to spend two days with the National Association of District Supervisors of Foreign Language (NADSFL) and then an additional day at the American Council of the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) conference.  Each day held its own unique experience (and, therefore, necessitates its own post).  If I can get around to it, I’ll detail my personal next steps in a final post sometime this week or next.

Day 1:

Wow.  What a day.  There are so many coordinators and supervisors here from across the nation, each sharing experiences and strategies for success.  It has been a true privilege to participate in these discussions.  They have expanded my lens quite a bit.

Some general themes that stuck out to me during the conversations I had:

  • Assessment: Assessment should be performance-based and rest on a foundation of formative evaluations from teachers, peers, self, and the general public.  I especially liked how Lynn Fulton Archer (@dlfulton) put it, “We are no longer the sole provider of content, so we can’t be the sole evaluator of that content.”  I think tech can naturally step in to broaden the audience of a student’s work.  It puts a student closer to the experience of “natural” acquisition of language because the impetus to learn comes from all directions, not just from the teacher.
  • Buy-in: Buy-in is a key factor in curricular success.  Both teachers and students should feel that their voices are heard and weighty in the selection, development, and delivery of curriculum.
  • Funding: Funding is an issue across the country, but there are bright spots in the form of FLAP and other federal grants.  There are also entire states who have begun a process of doing more with less, like Utah, but it requires a commitment to languages from the highest levels of government.
  • Modeling: We must participate, as supervisors, professional development leaders, and teachers, in the very tasks we are asking of our students.  Are we using 21st century tools and approaches in our own learning?  Are using the concepts of formative assessments, including performance assessments, to evaluate our own progress as professionals?  Are we asking ourselves to be self-directed, efficacious learners as we attempt to lead students down that road?

These are some provocative questions, ones that I’ll be pondering the next few days (years?).  Again, it’s been a privilege to listen to some very experienced supervisors share their common struggles and victories.

Above all, the biggest theme of the day was how to support the work of great teachers, who are daily in the trenches laboring to encourage kids to value and develop the skills necessary to succeed in our increasingly global economy.  I’m excited to get back among them.

Tech in the foreign language classroom (sharing session 1)



conversation

Last Wednesday I was able to sit down with a few foreign language teachers who are incorporating a number of tech tools into their instruction. It was a productive time of sharing and I thought it would be a good one to archive.

The agenda for the afternoon was simple: share what you’ve done or what you’re thinking about doing, chat for a while with a guest speaker via Skype, and finish sharing. A summary of these teachers’ ideas is below, organized by tool. The ideas below aren’t mine, but I took away some great things to share with others and I hope someone else will benefit from these as I did!

Smart Notebook

  • Highlighting — one high school teacher was pleased at how one simple act, highlighting, could direct her students’ attention. During the course of a lesson, this teacher would display the textbook through her document camera, or show a visual, etc., and annotate that by using a highlighter in Smart Notebook. When students had the floor, they duplicated the approach — highlighting during their own presentations to focus the attention of their peers.
  • Interactive Games — Notebook’s gallery sports a number of customizable interactive games, most of which reside in the “Lesson Activity Toolkit” area. These have been welcome additions to lessons for one teacher, who has enjoyed discovering and implementing some of these into her lessons.
  • “Hidden Answer” – a middle school teacher hides the answers to simple questions by setting the background of a Notebook page to the same color as one of her pens. After she inserts the question and answer into text boxes on the page (in a different color than the background), she ‘colors over’ the text with the pen color that matches the background. After students brainstorm answers to the question in the target language, one student gets to come up and “erase” till they find the answer.
  • Organization – another middle school teacher found that transitioning her lesson plans to Smart Notebook slides has helped her organize her own thoughts and collect related materials all in one place. For example, for a given lesson, this teacher uses the ‘Attachments’ tab (the paper clip icon) to keep the related quiz with the lesson itself. Then, if she happens to have too few copies, she can access resources she needs quickly.

Voicethread

  • Directions – a high school teacher has set up a Voicethread project where she asks students to give directions from one place to another. Using the drawing tool within Voicethread, students can illustrate turns as they describe them, which she found to be a nice addition, especially when she was unsure of a student’s pronunciation.
  • Getting the year started — another high school teacher took video from a trip she and her husband had made over the summer and created a discussion to start off the year for her level 5 students. Over the short clips she embedded into Voicethread, the teacher talked a bit about her summer and then asked questions inviting students to talk about their summers, using the target language. Feedback from her classes was positive, with some students even commenting that the assignment didn’t really “feel like” homework.

Google Earth

The same teacher who mentioned directions in Voicethread, talked about how she brought some context to those directions through Google Earth. Using the zoom function within Google Earth, this teacher was able to bring students to the city where sheonce lived and point out points of interest they could find there.

Digital Storytelling –

  • Tar Heel Reader — Another high school teacher spoke passionately about engaging students in the writing process as soon as possible, and providing a space for public display of those works. The site she shared, Tar Heel Reader, has some valuable examples of doing just this from in a variety of languages, all from a simple-to-use interface.
  • StoryBird – there are a number of other sites which can host examples of student stories in a similar format to the Tar Heel Reader. I brought up Storybird because it was the subject of a recent meeting I was able to attend with some UK modern language teachers. This site hosts the work of a number of different illustrators and invites students to pull work from these artists to create their own stories (a la The Mysteries of Harris Burdick).

Webcasting –

  • Skype — Two teachers from different high schools within the district are planning to give their students an authentic audience for some upcoming performance assessments. Students in these upper level classes will be writing and performing skits, but this time those skits won’t just be for the teacher and their peers. They will be performing for another class of kids they don’t know who are studying the same material.
  • Tokbox — Through a contact in New York, one teacher had a chance to pair her students with students from Mexico for a one-on-one conversation in the target language. Due to a few difficulties (weather shutting down the lab in Mexico, only 5 students able to talk at a time due to lab restrictions there) the teacher is looking to pair with another class. Some things learned from the process were that our students aren’t really comfortable talking with someone they don’t know and that they need directed help to prepare for holding a conversation.

Noah Geisel

Our guest speaker for the afternoon, Noah graciously agreed to chat with us about a couple tools he’s been trying out in his classroom. An accomplished teacher, Noah is also an adept presenter, even working through the limitations of Skype.  He took us through two tools: todaysmeet.com and befunky.com.

  • TodaysMeet — This tool is essentially an online chatroom. In Noah’s terms, it helps teachers harness the “backchannel” of their classroom, encouraging participation from all students through text. One unique feature of this chat is that the teacher can designate how long she wants the chat to exist (from 1 hr to a year) and each student response is limited to 140 characters, the size of a typical text message. One way Noah incorporates this tool into his instruction is by using it as a way to spark comprehensible input from his students. Later in a unit, after students have acquired some target vocabulary and phrases, Noah grabs 6 or 7 random photos from the internet and introduces a storytelling activity in which all students participate. Opening up a TodaysMeet chat, Noah asks his students to “help him” tell the story by writing captions for each photo as he displays them one at a time. For a few minutes each photo, students type and retype captions using the target vocabulary. They vote on which will be that photo’s caption, and then move to the next. While diacritical marks aren’t yet supported by TodaysMeet, Noah chooses to use this tool for communication activities that work on skills where such marks aren’t essential.
  • BeFunky — This is a simple photo manipulation tool. With only a couple clicks, you can make a photo into a comic book. Noah uses this tool to create review activities after a skit project. Noah identifies that student who needs something to do during the skits and asks him to be the photographer for the period. Once the skits are over, Noah selects one skit to transfer in BeFunky to comic form. Each photo of the skit he then drops into a word document and adds areas where students describe the action (the ’handout’ form in PowerPoint similar to this). When students walk in the next day, they recieve a worksheet where they must “retell” the story using target vocabulary. The project has greatly motivated language production, as students are eager to put words ”into someone else’s mouth.”

I’m looking forward to another time of sharing next semester!

Google Everything


I’ve been asked to do a presentation on “Google Everything” for high school social studies teachers in our district.  In 3 hrs.  Including time to allow teachers to incorporate elements of these tools into a lesson.

Which means, in short, that we won’t get to everything.  Thankfully, I have a Google Certified Teacher, Bill Bass, from whom I can pull great Google ideas.  Below are some ideas Bill sent my way and I’ll be expanding later during the time.  I may stream my presentation, but probably not the Google Earth portions.

  • Google Earth
    • Searching for .kmz and .kml files using Google’s Advanced Search
    • Saving .kmz files on a website (like the Revolutionary War tour I found at the History Tours wiki), opening those in Google Maps, and then embedding the result (see below)
    • Embedding media in .kmz files, especially video from YouTube or our district’s video hosting solution Parkway Digital — I’ve pursued extending this with foreign language teachers by embedding Voicethreads along a tour.  This allows kids to practice the target language while following a typical tour.
    • Using the slider tool to view change over time
  • Google Docs
    • The power of collaborative, individually accountable group work
    • Self-grading quizzes
  • Other Google Goodness
    • Goog411
    • Google Labs (maybe looking at Google Squared?)
    • Google Voice

This is the beginning, at least.  I’m sure I’ll be adding to this list.  I’ll list updates at the bottom of the post.


View Larger Map

My first MFL flashmeeting


Today I attended my first MFL flashmeeting, an  ’virtual’ face-to-face meeting with some great folks from the UK.  Thanks especially to Samantha Lunn and Isabelle Jones for their active involvement in and promotion of this great learning opportunity.

While I’m largely unfamiliar with the curriculum delivered across the pond, many teaching practices described during our meeting were similar to those I see with our teachers here in Missouri, though many, including the FLIP Approach, were new to me.   And although I hadn’t attended the conference that made up the greatest part of the discussion, I began thinking about how wonderful it was to gather a group together through this medium for direct reflection about that experience.  As I look forward to attending ACTFL here in the states, I’m already wondering about how I might organize or join in on an effort like this one stateside.

Kudos to Esther Hardman and Joe Dale for keeping the conversation on track, to Lisa Stevens for some great observations and an impromptu performance of la vaca lola (I’ll definitely be sharing that video with teachers here), and to all those who participated in this meeting.  I learned a lot from listening, and I look forward to participating next time!

Out of bounds


Today is the last day of an 8 week professional development course I’m teaching on the importance of understanding and expanding our professional/personal learning networks.  It’s been a good time for me — a time to reflect on my own practice, a challenge to think about these things more intentionally, a time to evaluate how successfully I’ve been engaging in networks myself.

For me, I’ve come to a few conclusions:

  1. I need to partition my life a little better.  I’m getting overwhelmed with all the information heading my way lately.  And I’m feeling the burden of a “need to connect.”  Planning how and when I access these networks, and letting it go when I don’t, is something I’d like to see in my own professional practice.
  2. Reflection is good.  I knew this already, but the face-to-face collaboration that I’ve enjoyed during this class has reinforced this understanding again for me.
  3. These tools are worth the investment.  I think they’re worth my time primarily because, as David Warlick so eloquently says, “it’s not about the technology.”  I’m grateful that people are so willingly sharing their interests, questions, and expertise online.  It has helped me grow as a professional and as a person.

I’m looking forward to contributing to more of these conversations, outside the typical bounds of face-to-face connections, in a more intentional and consistent way, in the next few months.   I hope the teachers in my class have taken as much away from this experience as I have.

Reflecting on PLNs


Today I’m leading a workshop on Personal Learning Networks — how to begin one and how to maintain it.  I’m highlighting two tools in the course of our 3 2-hour sessions together, and I’m hoping it’s enough time to begin the journey, but I know a change like this doesn’t happen overnight (and certainly not in 6 hours).

At least, that’s not the way it’s happened for me.  I’m still in the very beginning stages of this journey, but my excitement is building as my connections grow.  I’m continually surprised and encouraged by the willingness of others to contribute to the growth of my own ideas, and I’m privileged and honored to think that  I might contribute to another’s own professional (and personal) growth.

A screencast from LiveStream captured the first 25 minutes of the 2 hrs we had together for this first stage.  The slides visible are from my Google presentation.  Some of the information is from my own experience, but mostly from the rich set of resources being created by much better-informed professionals.  Direct links to my research on this topic can be found in the presentation.

So, as I link my fellow participants to my blogroll, please stop by their “home” and welcome them to the world of PLNs!

Notes:

Will Richardson’s comments on personal learning networks can be found in my Google presentation or on YouTube.  Also, in my presentation, I reference one thinker as “the guy whose name I can’t seem to remember.”  This is more a reflection on my train of thought and my recent arrival into ed tech circles than the importance of the person, as the “mystery man” was none other than Kevin Honeycutt, whose apt analogy of the social web as “playground without the adults” continues to shape my message to teachers and parents.  I highly recommend Kevin’s work on the subject of Internet Safety and his social network for practicing and budding artists.

A brief intro to blogging


Blogging: A Quick Overview

View more presentations from dmcallister.
Corrected link to Blogging Action Plan Handout created by Maggie Verster

TPACK Cliff’s Notes, Part 1


Today I’m beginning what I hope will be a “Cliff’s Notes” approach to understanding the framework for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK, also known as TPACK), a model organized by Mishra and Koehler, built from the large body of research about education and technology.  These posts will primarily be to hone my own understanding of the concept, but if you find any of the following beneficial or confusing, I always welcome comments.

Summarizing such a far-reaching concept will inevitably result in omissions and understatements.  If you are interested in a community-created resource that might fill out the picture I begin here, please visit the TPACK wiki.  Punya Mishra also manages a great blog, where he highlights what’s happening with the framework around the US and the world.  Finally, the information I’ll be summarizing comes from my reading of a handbook for educators on the TPACK framework, which applies the framework to a number of content areas and contexts.

We should probably begin with the framework itself:

TPACK framework
(image from tpack.org)

The concept is fairly straight-forward.  When a teacher walks into his classroom, he comes with a certain knowledge of content, pedagogy, and technology.  Each of these domains has it’s own set of guidelines, best practices, and popular authors.  Yet, though we can concentrate on one domain or another at a given time, in reality we have to wrestle with all of them, all at once, within a context that is ever-shifting, depending on the given student, period, or (as it often seems in middle school) phase of the moon.

This brings me to a concept that runs through much of the TPACK literature I’ve read thus far — the concept of teaching as a “wicked problem.”  Wicked problems, according to Koehler and Mishra, referencing the work of two earlier researchers Rittel and Webber, “have incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements ….[and] cannot be solved in a traditional linear fashion” due to the sheer number of variables involved and the tendency of solutions, wherever applied, to create new problems themselves.  To my ear, that sounds just like teaching — thousands of tiny decisions that must be made almost every second of the day, which all, in some way, impact the lives and the learning of kids.

One aspect I like about the framework, in light of this, is that it validates my experience as a teacher.  I have a bit more trust in something that acknowledges the difficulty of the profession up front, and then begins to focus an ordered lens on my practice.

What the framework seems to bring to the table is a method of sorting through each of the three knowledge domains, examining how one relates to another, and then describing what sort of teaching and learning occurs when all meet together, all the while understanding that these domains exist within a context that may change from culture to culture or from moment to moment.  I find such a model, simple in its presentation and sensitive to a teacher’s experience, engaging and encouraging.  I look forward to learning more.

Reflecting on the journey


For those in my blogging salary credit, let’s reflect using this collaborative tool.

For those who may be interested in our conclusions, feel free to check out the same!  Add your own thoughts by adding a row.

Blurring the line …


Before the read/write web, relationships were face-to-face or through tangible media (i.e. letters).   Connections were built and maintained through avenues bound up in the physical world.  Not so today …

I’ve heard 3 stories from teachers in my district I’d like to share in this post.  2 of them are posts on blogs, so I’ll summarize and trust that readers can follow up for themselves.  Let’s start with a conversation I had in the face-to-face world first, a new spin on the “expert” relationship.

In the world before a participatory internet, people relied on “experts,” set apart by their degrees or personal experience, for recommendations of books, plays, TV shows, etc.  But now, if I buy a book or an iPod or anything else on a site like Amazon, one of the first things I do is drill down to the user reviews.  I prefer products that have lots of comments, and I always read the top few that other users have rated as “helpful.”  These people may not be experts, but they’ve got some experience with the product (which is more than I have at that moment).

So, what if we bring the power of gaining “expert” status to bear as motivation for student writing?  That’s just the idea of one 1st-year teacher at the middle school I serve.  In the next few months his hope is to have students write book reviews, which will then be posted to Amazon, and have them track their review to see if it becomes one of the top rated.  How powerful is that!  These students will be connected to the world, and paying close attention to their writing!

Concerning the impact of well-coached blogging with secondary students, check out this story of how a blog broke down barriers within a high-school English class.

And be sure to read these two posts (1, 2) about how blogging with elementary students brought one kid, who felt like he wasn’t a member of the classroom community, back into conversation with his peers (and back to school).

These examples illustrate, to me, the power of the new net.  The idea that, in the face to face world, esteem can be fostered, conversation can be created, and compassion can be felt — all from interactions online — compels me to believe that what we do as educators with these new techologies is critical to engaging and preparing our students to excel as citizens of the 21st century.